Legal Opinion

Muldoon v. Hostuttler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 15, 1924No. 13401PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

'¿This /aetslon wias- commenced by the defendant in error to foreclose a real estafe mortgage securing a promissory note for the principal sum of $1,600.

The defendant contends that the trial coirrt erred in failing to find that the defendant had made a valid tender prior to the filing of this suit. The amount tendered by the lefendant was $1,030, and, according to the judgmfent rendered by the trial court, lacked several hundred dollars of being enough to pay the amount due the plaintiff. The defendant contends-, however, that the amount due was within the exclusive knowledge of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shawnee Gas & Electric Co. v. MotesenbockerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Krauss Et US. v. PottsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Wells v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Bly v. PoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Marland v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Ford Motor Credit Company v. GoingsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  3. Smith v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API