Muldoon v. Hostuttler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
'¿This /aetslon wias- commenced by the defendant in error to foreclose a real estafe mortgage securing a promissory note for the principal sum of $1,600.
The defendant contends that the trial coirrt erred in failing to find that the defendant had made a valid tender prior to the filing of this suit. The amount tendered by the lefendant was $1,030, and, according to the judgmfent rendered by the trial court, lacked several hundred dollars of being enough to pay the amount due the plaintiff. The defendant contends-, however, that the amount due was within the exclusive knowledge of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shawnee Gas & Electric Co. v. MotesenbockerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Krauss Et US. v. PottsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Wells v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Bly v. PoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Marland v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Ford Motor Credit Company v. GoingsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
- Smith v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952