Legal Opinion
United States v. Terry Christensen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 25, 2015No. 08-50531, 08-50570, 09-50115, 09-50125, 09-50128, 09-50159, 10-50434, 10-50462, 10-50464, 10-50472UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Defendants Terry Christensen, Anthony Pellicano, Mark Arneson, Rayford Turner, Kevin Kachikian, and Abner Nicherie appeal their criminal convictions stemming from a widespread criminal enterprise offering illegal private investigation services in Southern California.
The facts of this case have been related in detail in a concurrently filed opinion that discusses some of the issues raised on appeal and explains why some of the counts of conviction are reversed. See United States v. Christensen, 801 F.3d 970 (9th Cir.2015). In this memorandum disposition, we affirm as to all…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. RomeroDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- United States v. Mark ArnesonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2023