Legal Opinion
Fort Washington Resources, Inc. v. Tannen
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 4, 1994No. 93-CV-2415PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiffs renewed motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff, Fort Washington Resources, Inc., commenced this action in May 1993 against defendant, Dr. Tannen, seeking damages for breach of contract, negligent performance of professional services, intentional interference with prospective business advantage, and conversion. Defendant filed a counterclaim against plaintiff and Kirk Pendleton, plaintiffs chief executive officer, seeking damages for breach of contract,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Alvaro Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc. And Playskool Baby, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Porreco v. PorrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Government Employees Insurance Co. v. NealeyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Williams Controls, Inc. v. Parente, Randolph, Orlando, Carey & AssociatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Leonard A. Feinberg, Inc. v. Central Asia Capital Corp., Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.