Legal Opinion

Dowling v. Salliotte

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1890PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion. '

1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.

The question in this case is whether, where a deed is made to a man and woman who are in fact husband and 'wife, but such relationship does not appear upon the face of the deed, it creates a- tenancy in common or a joint tenancy under How. Stat. §§ 5560, 5561.

The conceded facts in the case are as follows: On the 3d day of March, 1858, John B. Oicotte et al. were the owners in fee of the lands in controversy in this cause, and on that *132day, by a quitclaim deed, conveyed said lands to George Cicotte and Ellen Cicotte. On the 30th day of December, 1871, George Cicotte died intestate. On the 1st…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Fisher v. ProvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Meeker v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Vinton v. BeamerMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Ætna Insurance v. ReshMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re the Appeal of LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hoyt v. WinstanleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Aplin v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Hinkley v. BishoppMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Hawley v. DibbleMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API