Legal Opinion
In Re Electrical Carbon Products Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 30, 2004No. MDL 1514PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are eight motions to dismiss filed by nine corporate defendants in this multi-district case which involves allegations that these corporate defendants, and others, “engaged in a worldwide conspiracy” between January 1990 and December 2001 “the purpose and effect of which was to fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize prices, and to allocate markets and customers for Electrical Carbon Products sold in the United States and elsewhere,” in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. (Third Am. Compl. ¶ 1.) The defendants…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rotella v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Carrier Corporation v. Outokumpu OyjCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- In Re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Sarpolis ex rel. Estate of Miller v. TereshkoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. KearnsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.