Legal Opinion

Artz v. Hurley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 5, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

The jury found for the plaintiff in this action of tort to recover for property damage caused by the escape of water from second floor premises occupied by and in the control of the defendant onto first floor store premises of the plaintiff. There is here presented the defendant’s exception to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict.

The escaping water was discovered a little after 7 a.m, February 16, 1950. It was traced to the near-ceiling water tank over a seat in one of two toilet rooms on the defendant’s premises. These premises were used for roller skating, dancing, and basket…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Couris v. Casco Amusement Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  2. Angerman Co., Inc. v. Edgemon Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Sylvester v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Brian v. B. Sopkin & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Pinney v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reil v. Lowell Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  2. United States Trunk Co. v. Bristol Knitting Mills, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Benzaquin v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
  4. Federal Insurance v. Boston Water & Sewer CommissionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  5. Long v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API