Legal Opinion

Providence Construction Co. v. Bauer.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 17, 1997No. A97A1630PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

This case presents the Court its first opportunity to apply the provisions of OCGA § 9-11-11.1. This 1996 law, sometimes referred to as an “anti-SLAPP” statute, is designed to prevent “Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation.” See Kent & Isenberg, “Georgia’s New Anti-SLAPP Statute,” Ga. Bar J. (June 1997), p. 26.

Providence Construction Company brought this suit against Dave Bauer and other residents of Cumberland Ridge, a Cobb County subdivision developed by Providence. Providence is represented in court by its president, who is not a member of the State Bar of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eckles v. Atlanta Technology Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Rosen v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Porubiansky v. Emory UniversityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Little v. Fleet FinanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Young v. John Deere Plow CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Metzler v. RowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Browns Mill Development Co., Inc. v. DentonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Davis v. Emmis Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Adventure Outdoors, Inc. v. BloombergDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
  5. Langley v. Mp Spring Lake, LLC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API