Betts v. Stephenson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action to quiet the plaintiff’s title to a group of unpatented mining claims. The defendants moved for a nonsuit on the grounds that the evidence did not show that these claims were open and unappropriated government land at the time in question; that the evidence disclosed that the discovery work was insufficient under section 2304 of the Public Resources Code; and that the locations were null and void under section 2307 of that code. In considering the motion the court stated that there was so far a failure of proof under section 2304, and offered the plaintiff an opportunity to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Wilson v. FreemanMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- Thornton v. KaufmanMontana Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- MacDonald v. Midland Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Smith v. DalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Pascoe v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962