Legal Opinion

Oppenheim, Oberndorf & Co. v. President Suspender Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 5, 1925No. 1683PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

The appellant, Oppenheim, Obemdorf & Co., Ine., applied for the registration by the Patent Office of the word “President” as its trade-mark for certain articles of clothing. It appeared, however, that in fact it had used the mark only in the sale of men’s underwear and men’s dress, negligee, and work shirts; its application, therefore, has been treated in the record as if confined to those classes of articles only.

Tho appellee, the President Suspender Company, a corporation, filed an opposition to the application, based upon two several contentions, to wit: First, that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. E-Z Waist Co. v. Reliance Mfg. Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1923
  2. In re Inderrieden Canning Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vick Chemical Co. v. Vick Medicine Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1925
  2. Pro-Phy-Lac-Tic Brush Co. v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1935
  3. R. H. Macy & Co. v. H. W. Carter & SonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  4. Haas Bros. Fabrics Corp. v. Bliss, Fabyan & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  5. Cluett, Peabody & Co. v. SpetalnikDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API