Legal Opinion
Haas Bros. Fabrics Corp. v. Bliss, Fabyan & Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 6, 1926No. 1861PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, sustaining an opposition to the registration of a trade-mark.
The opposers, Bliss, Fabyan & Co., are sole distributors for numerous manufacturers of cotton and artificial. silk goods. Among these are crinkly seersucker fabrics composed of cotton, or of cotton and artificial silk, used in large part for dresses for women and children. In January, 1910, they adopted the word “Ripplette” as their trademark for goods of various classes, including these, and on March 12, 1910, they obtained a registration…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- E-Z Waist Co. v. Reliance Mfg. Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1923
- Oppenheim, Oberndorf & Co. v. President Suspender Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- California Packing Corporation v. Tillman & BendelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Sun-Maid Raisin Growers of California v. American Grocer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Bliss, Fabyan & Co. v. Aileen Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Industrial Rayon Corp. v. Dutchess Underwear Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- California Packing Corporation v. Tillman & BendelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.