Legal Opinion
Clift v. Hart
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 10, 1916No. 7739PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error from District Court, Canadian County ; John AV. Hayson, Judge. Action by George AV. Hart against H. S. Clift and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BLEAKMORE, C.
This action was commenced in the district court of Canadian county by George AV. Hunt, plaintiff, against H. S. Clift and L. B. Clift, defendants, to recover on a promissory note in the sum of $600.
Defendants answered:
“Hirst. These defendants admit the execution and delivery of the said promissory note sued on herein.
“Second. Further answering, these defendants allege that said note was obtained by the plaintiff through means of fraud and. misrepresentations, in this, to wit: The said plaintiff, being ther^-and there the owner, or alleged owner, of a certain leasehold…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wesley v. DiamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Hazlett v. WilkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Reger v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Herrin v. LibbeySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1853
- Long v. KendallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elling v. Bank of JeffersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Greene v. HumphreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Rock v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925