Legal Opinion
Robert Twitchell, Jayne Ackerman Rogers v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1963No. 17742PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.
In this criminal case, the appeals are by Robert Twitehell, Margaret Elinor Conklin, Jayne Ackerman Rogers (Mrs. Rogers), and Harrison Rogers (Mr. Rogers) . They were tried under a nine count indictment, in which Max Kosher and Dale Ratcliff were also named as defendants. Kosher and Ratcliff were not tried.
Count I charged all of the named defendants, together with Gloria Ashen, Gustave Meyers, Calvin Kellar, Norman Winslow, Vivian Hendricks, and others unknown, with a conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 871) to violate sections 2421, 1 and 2422 2 (the Mann Act) as principals (see…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Schaffer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. RoselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Gordon Arthur Lyda and Albert Francis Perrault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Antonio Corallo, Henry Fried, Daniel J. Motto and S. T. Grand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. PressCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States v. SinghCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.