Legal Opinion
United States v. Singh
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 8, 2008No. 06-4338, 06-4812, 06-4883PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, dismissed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge MOTZ joined.
OPINION
KING, Circuit Judge:
These appeals arise from a criminal proceeding in the Northern District of West Virginia in which defendants Surendra “Sam” Singh, Dilipkumar “Dan” Patel (“Patel”), and Jalaram, Incorporated (collectively, the “Defendants”), were convicted by jury of a total of fourteen offenses, including conspiracy to violate the Mann Act, in contravention of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (the “Mann Act conspiracy”), ten counts of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens Football Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. BashamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. AshleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. James DinkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. JeffersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.