Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Anderson
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 1980No. Civ. 46362PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHE, J.
The Bishops appeal from a judgment entered in favor of respondent Arthur Anderson, M.D., in an action for damages arising from malpractice. After denying appellants’ request for trial by jury, the trial judge heard the case and determined that the Bishops’ suit was barred by the statute of limitations. Here, appellants raise several questions with respect to respondent’s statute of limitations defense and in addition, they challenge the trial court’s refusal to allow a jury trial. The jury trial issue is dispositive.
Appellants filed an at-issue memorandum on August 25, 1977,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Byram v. Superior Ct. of Sacramento Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Gonzales v. NorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Cowlin v. PringleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- March v. PettisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
3Cited by9 opinions
- Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Winston v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Simmons v. Prudential InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Mackovksa v. Viewcrest Road Properties LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.