Bjelland v. City of Mankato
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Blue Earth county to recover $1,695 for necessary services rendered in connection with eradicating and controlling an epidemic of smallpox and typhoid fever in defendant city. From an order, Pfau, J., sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The plaintiff was the health officer of the city of Mankato, and commenced this action in the district court of the county of Blue Earth to recover $1,695 for necessary services rendered in connection with eradicating and controlling an epidemic of smallpox and typhoid fever in the defendant city, pursuant to an alleged contract with the board of health of the city. A general demurrer to the complaint was interposed by the city, and the trial court made its order sustaining it, from which the plaintiff appealed.
The complaint alleges, in effect, that the plaintiff was, during all *25of the times…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stone v. BevansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Young v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Chairman of Board of Health v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Town of Martinsburg v. ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- City of Mankato v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- City of Minneapolis v. CanterburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Marshall v. LovellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
- Mares v. JanutkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Kotschevar v. Township of North ForkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949