Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2013No. S192828PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

After declaring a fiscal emergency, a charter city adopted a mandatory furlough program for its civilian employees. Many employees represented by a union filed grievances against the city, arguing that the furloughs violated duly ratified memorandums of understanding (MOUs) *1091governing the terms and conditions of their employment. When their grievances were denied, these employees requested arbitration, and when the city refused to arbitrate, their union petitioned the superior court for an order compelling the city to arbitrate the furloughs dispute. The superior court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Schneider Moving & Storage Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  2. County of Fresno v. Fresno Deputy Sheriff's Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Network Capital Funding Corp. v. PapkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API