Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 7/28/16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA TIMOTHY SANDQUIST, ) ) Plaintiff and Appellant, ) ) S220812 v. ) ) Ct.App. 2/7 B244412 LEBO AUTOMOTIVE, INC., et al., ) ) Los Angeles County Defendants and Respondents. ) Super. Ct. No. BC476523 ____________________________________) Plaintiff Timothy Sandquist and the various defendants here are parties to an arbitration agreement. A salient question is whether that agreement permits or prohibits arbitration on a classwide basis. Here we must answer a question one step removed—who decides whether the agreement permits or prohibits classwide…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.