Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 2007PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ciparick, J.

This appeal tests the jurisdictional sufficiency of an information charging disorderly conduct. Because the factual allegations in the accusatory instrument failed to establish a prima facie case, the conviction should be vacated and the information dismissed.

Defendant was charged, by information, with disorderly conduct in Manhattan (Penal Law § 240.20 [5]). 1 The information, tracking the statutory language, states, in part, that on June 12, 2004, at approximately 2:01 a.m., on 42nd Street and Seventh Avenue “defendant, with intent to cause public incon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. People v. CarcelNew York Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. People v. KalinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. SuberNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. People v. Guevara-CarreroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. SumterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. The People v. Matthew P.New York Court of Appeals · 2015

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API