People v. Jones
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ciparick, J.
This appeal tests the jurisdictional sufficiency of an information charging disorderly conduct. Because the factual allegations in the accusatory instrument failed to establish a prima facie case, the conviction should be vacated and the information dismissed.
Defendant was charged, by information, with disorderly conduct in Manhattan (Penal Law § 240.20 [5]). 1 The information, tracking the statutory language, states, in part, that on June 12, 2004, at approximately 2:01 a.m., on 42nd Street and Seventh Avenue “defendant, with intent to cause public incon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- People v. CarcelNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by70 opinions
- People v. KalinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. SuberNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. Guevara-CarreroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. SumterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- The People v. Matthew P.New York Court of Appeals · 2015
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.