Legal Opinion

Native Village of Eklutna v. Alaska Railroad

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2004No. S-10270, S-10279Published

1Opinion of the Court

87 P.3d 41 (2004)

NATIVE VILLAGE OF EKLUTNA, Appellant,

v.

ALASKA RAILROAD CORPORATION and Municipality of Anchorage, Appellees.

Municipality of Anchorage, Cross-Appellant,

v.

Alaska Railroad Corporation, Cross-Appellee.

Nos. S-10270, S-10279.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

March 12, 2004.

Rehearing Denied April 16, 2004.

Sara E. Heideman, Hedland, Brennan, Heideman & Cooke, Anchorage, for Appellant.

William S. Cummings, Ashburn & Mason, Anchorage, for Appellee/Cross-Appellee Alaska Railroad Corporation.

William W. Whitaker, Assistant Municipal Attorney, and William A. Green, Municipal Attorney, Anchorage, for…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local 1625 v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API