Legal Opinion
State v. Chrisman
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 26, 1980No. 46750PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.
Defendants Carl Overdahl and Neil Chris-man, students at Washington State University, were tried without a jury and convicted of possession of more than 40 grams of marijuana, a felony. Chrisman was also convicted of possession of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). Both defendants appealed and the Court of Appeals affirmed their convictions. State v. Chrisman, 24 Wn. App. 385, 600 P.2d 1316 (1979). They then petitioned this court for review. The charges against Overdahl, however, were subsequently dismissed, and he withdrew his petition for discretionary review. We accepted review of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Washington v. ChrismanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. MyrickWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. SeagullWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. ChrismanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.