In Re Handsome
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
Each petitioner in these consolidated matters pleaded guilty to a felony pursuant to a plea bargain and was placed on probation on condition that he serve a year in county jail. Each thereafter filed a request seeking credit for presentencing jailtime. We treated these requests, however captioned, as petitions for writs of habeas corpus, requested responses from the Attorney General, received additional briefing from the state public defender and consolidated them for hearing.
We conclude that relief must be denied because petitioners, who attack arguably improper plea…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. KaaneheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re SutherlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. KirkpatrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- In Re FinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BlessingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- In Re ChamberlainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. SchulerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. GallegoAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1979
- People v. MurilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.