In Re Sutherland
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
We issued an order to show cause in this case for the purpose of determining whether a plea of guilty entered by petitioner Montie Paul Sutherland to a charge of possessing heroin (Health & Saf. Code, § 11500) was properly received under the standards set forth in Boykin v. Alabama (1969) 395 U.S. 238 [23 L.Ed.2d 274, 89 S.Ct. 1309], In re Tahl (1969) 1 Cal.3d 122 [81 Cal.Rptr. 577, 460 P.2d 449], and People v. Rizer (1971) 5 Cal.3d 35 [95 Cal.Rptr. 23, 484 P.2d 1367]. We conclude that the plea is invalid because petitioner was not informed of two of the three constitutional…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. SerratoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Mills v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.