Legal Opinion

In Re Sutherland

California Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1972No. Crim. 15731PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We issued an order to show cause in this case for the purpose of determining whether a plea of guilty entered by petitioner Montie Paul Sutherland to a charge of possessing heroin (Health & Saf. Code, § 11500) was properly received under the standards set forth in Boykin v. Alabama (1969) 395 U.S. 238 [23 L.Ed.2d 274, 89 S.Ct. 1309], In re Tahl (1969) 1 Cal.3d 122 [81 Cal.Rptr. 577, 460 P.2d 449], and People v. Rizer (1971) 5 Cal.3d 35 [95 Cal.Rptr. 23, 484 P.2d 1367]. We conclude that the plea is invalid because petitioner was not informed of two of the three constitutional…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. SerratoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Mills v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API