People v. Kirkpatrick
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCOMB, J.
The only issues raised on this appeal are (one)' whether the conviction must be reversed because the pleas of guilty to a charge of burglary in the second degree (Pen. Code, § 459) in action No. A-543205 and to a charge of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496) in action No. A-581416, were properly received under the standards set forth in Boykin v. Alabama (1969) 395 U.S. 238 [23 L.Ed.2d 274, 89 S.Ct. 1709]; In re Tahl (1969) 1 Cal.3d 122 [81 Cal.Rptr. 577, 460 P.2d 449]; People v. Rizer (1971) 5 Cal.3d 35 [95 Cal.Rptr. 23, 484 P.2d 1367]; and In re Sutherland (1972) 6…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. MerkourisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. CrandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. SerratoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Townsend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.