Legal Opinion

People v. Kirkpatrick

California Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1972No. Crim. 16143PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCOMB, J.

The only issues raised on this appeal are (one)' whether the conviction must be reversed because the pleas of guilty to a charge of burglary in the second degree (Pen. Code, § 459) in action No. A-543205 and to a charge of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496) in action No. A-581416, were properly received under the standards set forth in Boykin v. Alabama (1969) 395 U.S. 238 [23 L.Ed.2d 274, 89 S.Ct. 1709]; In re Tahl (1969) 1 Cal.3d 122 [81 Cal.Rptr. 577, 460 P.2d 449]; People v. Rizer (1971) 5 Cal.3d 35 [95 Cal.Rptr. 23, 484 P.2d 1367]; and In re Sutherland (1972) 6…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. MerkourisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. CrandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. SerratoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Townsend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API