Legal Opinion

United States v. Chester Sylvester, Ted Burn Sylvester, Floyd Soileau, Timothy Sylvester, and Jules Ericke

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 15, 1988No. 87-4496PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEE, Circuit Judge:

The district court found defendants guilty of hunting on a baited field in violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), 16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq., and 50 C.F.R. § 20.21(i). Substantial evidence supports, and we thus affirm, these convictions. One defendant was additionally convicted of taking a migratory non-game bird in violation of the Act. A federal agent obtained evidence of this violation during a search of defendant’s hunting box. We remand the suppression issue raised by this search to the district court for further consideration.

FACTS

These gamesmen tacked too…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. Santos Villarreal and Sergio GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Alexis Javier AngueiraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Ferrell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  4. United States v. Edward Lee DonnesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Frank Stallings, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API