Legal Opinion

United States v. Olesen

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 10, 1961No. Crim. No. 30012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KUNZEL, District Judge.

Defendant Kay Olesen is charged with taking and shooting ducks by aid of baiting and over a baited area in violation of regulations issued by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C.A. § 703 et seq., the regulations providing in part that migratory birds may not be taken by “aid of baiting, or on or over any baited area.” 50 C.F.R. § 10.3(b) (9). Defendant has pleaded “not guilty.” The parties have stipulated “that the said Defendant Kay Olesen be tried upon the facts as set forth in the Briefs heretofore filed” and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Penn Dairies, Inc. v. Milk Control Comm'n of Pa.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Cochrane v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  3. M. Allen Clemons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  4. Carty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis Delahoussaye, David Lemoyne Knerien and Robert Lee RichardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. JB Blanton Company v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  3. United States v. ArdoinDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1977
  4. Calipatria Land Co. v. LujanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API