Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. National Bank of Washington

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1981No. 79-651PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Associate Judge:

This appeal is an aftermath of the extensive pension fund litigation commenced over a decade ago as Blankenship v. Boyle. 1 We resolve whether a portion of a payment made by appellee, The National Bank of Washington (NBW), in settlement of that action is deductible as “interest to .. . depositors” under the District of Columbia’s gross earnings tax on certain financial institutions. 2 Finding error in the trial court’s determination that NBW’s settlement payment did constitute deductible interest, we reverse and reinstate the District’s denial of the bank’s refund…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Woodward v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Anchor Coupling Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rock Creek Plaza-Woodner Ltd. Partnership v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. District of Columbia v. Acme Reporting Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. School Street Associates Ltd. Partnership v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Hospitality Temps Corp. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Brisker v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API