District of Columbia v. National Bank of Washington
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Associate Judge:
This appeal is an aftermath of the extensive pension fund litigation commenced over a decade ago as Blankenship v. Boyle. 1 We resolve whether a portion of a payment made by appellee, The National Bank of Washington (NBW), in settlement of that action is deductible as “interest to .. . depositors” under the District of Columbia’s gross earnings tax on certain financial institutions. 2 Finding error in the trial court’s determination that NBW’s settlement payment did constitute deductible interest, we reverse and reinstate the District’s denial of the bank’s refund…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Woodward v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Anchor Coupling Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rock Creek Plaza-Woodner Ltd. Partnership v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- District of Columbia v. Acme Reporting Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- School Street Associates Ltd. Partnership v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hospitality Temps Corp. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Brisker v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.