Legal Opinion
Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 12, 2001No. Nos. 99-1390, 99-1399 and 99-1444PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners1 seek review of four orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) relating to three pipeline capacity sale contracts between El Paso Natural Gas Company (“El Paso”) and Dynegy Marketing and Trade (“Dyne-gy”) (formerly National Gas Clearinghouse). Petitioners contend that in approving the contracts, FERC abused its discretion and acted arbitrarily and capriciously by (1) not adhering more closely to antitrust principles, as instructed by the court in Southern California Edison v. FERC, 172 F.3d…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Elizabeth Boyer v. Chief Judge Haiganush BedrosianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
- Pub Util Cmsn St CA v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- TOXCO, INC. v. ChuDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- West v. HornerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Toxco Inc. v. ChuDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011