Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

West v. Horner

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 14, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2009-2224PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.

Pro se Plaintiff Arthur West brings this lawsuit against various federal and state officials in charge of proposing and approving road-construction projects in Northern Virginia. Because the particular project about which he complains has been abandoned, his current suit is moot. In addition, as the project proposed in its place has not yet received final agency approval, Plaintiff cannot amend his Complaint to proceed on this new challenge either.

I. Factual Background

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin County, Florida v. Department of TransportationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. Vactor v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Zemeka v. Holder, Jr.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Sierra Club v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
  5. Stewart v. WainwrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API