Legal Opinion

Reifschneider v. City and County of Denver

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1996No. 94CA1402PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge BRIGGS.

Plaintiff, Albert Reifschneider, appeals the trial court’s order granting the motion of defendant, City and County of Denver, for a new trial on the basis of juror confusion. Plaintiff and his attorneys, John Gehlhausen, P.C., John Gehlhausen, and Darla Scranton Specht (plaintiffs attorneys), also contest the trial court’s order, prior to the second trial, awarding attorneys fees and costs to defendant upon dismissal of plaintiffs added claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). We vacate the judgment of the second trial, reverse the order granting a new trial, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wark v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. People v. TweedyColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Simpson v. Darwin Lee Stjernholm, D.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Middleton v. BeckettColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. JuarezColorado Court of Appeals · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API