Legal Opinion
Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Wood
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 11, 1923No. 13509PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COCHRAN. J.
This was an action instituted by R. G. Wood against the Fidelity A Deposit Company of Maryland to recover on a burglary insurance policy. The parties will be designated plaintiff and defendant, according to the position occupied in the lower court.
The policy sued on contains the following provision:
“The company shall not be liable for loss or damage unless books -and accounts are kept by the assured and are kept in such manner that the exact amount of loss can be accurately determined therefrom by the company.”
In order to show a compliance with this provision of the policy, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Ruffner Bros. v. Dutchess InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Malin v. Mercantile Town Mutual InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Scottish Union & National Ins. v. Moore Mill & Gin Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Co. v. LindseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
- Concordia Fire Ins. Co. v. BarkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- National Surety Corp. v. SmockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951