Legal Opinion
Concordia Fire Ins. Co. v. Barkett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 2, 1925No. 15632PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ESTES, C.
Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, inverse to their order here. Plaintiffs sued on two fire insurance policies, aggregating $7,000, covering their stock of merchandise destroyed and damaged by fire on February 21, 1923. Judgment on verdict was for plaintiffs for $4,000. Defendant prosecutes error. The following facts are either not disputed or are supported by sufficient quantum of evidence to sustain the verdict: That on the day following" the fire the adjuster of defendant, together with an appraiser of stocks, went to the scene of the loss…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Life Ins. Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co. v. WagesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. DonahueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Home Ins. Co. of New York v. BallardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- American Ins. Co. of Newark, N.J. v. RodenhouseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Massey v. Farmers Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of NY v. PenickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Trinity Baptist Church v. Guideone Elite InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- Massey v. Farmers Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992