Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pure Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1931No. Appeal, 8PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Simpson,

The fundamental question involved in this case is whether the City of Philadelphia is required to pay the tax per gallon provided by the Act of May 1,1929, P. L. 1037, on all gasoline purchased and consumed by it in the performance of its governmental functions as an agent of the Commonwealth.

Defendant sold to the city a large quantity of gasoline during March, 1930. The city refused to pay the four cents per gallon specified in the statute. The State settled an account against defendant on the theory that it should have collected the tax from the city. In due…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Provident Life & Trust Co. v. HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Spangler's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Pittsburg v. Sterrett Subdistrict SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Commonwealth v. Girard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Commonwealth v. Erie Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Southwest Delaware County Municipal Authority v. Aston TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Lawrence Township School District Tax CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API