Legal Opinion
Grant v. Sullivan
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 17, 1989No. Civ. 88-0921PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
Once again we are presented with a case in which a claimant or claimants for Social Security disability benefits allege that Administrative Law Judge (AU) Russell Ro-well is biased against disability claimants generally. See, e.g., Tate v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, No. 84-1495 (M.D.Pa. Orders Nos. 1, 2, and 3 of Aug. 3, 1988) (Muir, J.); Wallace v. Sullivan, No. 88-0295, 1989 WL 109098 (M.D.Pa. Mar. 20, 1989) (Muir, J.); Schneck v. Bowen, No. 88-0901, 1989 WL 109557 (M.D.Pa. Feb. 27, 1989) (Kosik, J.). The Plaintiffs-claimants assert…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jerome G. WEIKERT, Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Lois M. Grant, on Behalf of Herself and All Other Similarly Situated Persons v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Grant v. SullivanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Crisci v. ShalalaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Grant v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.