Legal Opinion
Grant v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 23, 2000No. 3:CV-88-0921PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
On August 12, 1988, an amended complaint against the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was filed on behalf of a class of social security disability claimants whose claims for benefits were denied by Administrative Law Judge Russell Rowell (hereinafter “ALJ Rowell”). 1 The core allegation in this matter is that ALJ Rowell was biased generally against disability claimants and his bias deprived them of their right to a full and fair hearing in violation of the Social Security Act and the due process clause of the Fifth…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pronti v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
- Gorecki v. MassanariDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Small v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2004
- Gilliland v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Pritchett v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.