Legal Opinion
Grant v. Sullivan
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 21, 1990No. 3:CV-88-0921PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
Lois M. Grant commenced this action by filing a complaint in which she named as the Defendant the Secretary of Health and Human and Services (Secretary) seeking reversal of a final decision of the Secretary denying her benefits under the Social Security Disability Insurance Program, established by the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401, et seq. Grant based her claim for relief upon two theories: (1) the Secretary’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence and was contrary to law and (2) Administrative Law Judge (AU) Russell Rowell who…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Schweiker v. McClureSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Robidoux v. CelaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Robidoux v. CelaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Frank v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Lois M. Grant, on Behalf of Herself and All Other Similarly Situated Persons v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Welling v. AlexyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.