Legal Opinion
Fasken v. Oil Conservation Commission
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1975No. 9958PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
This appeal is from two summary judgments entered by the Eddy County District Court which affirmed two orders of the Oil Conservation Commission (Commission). Appellant (Fasken) had filed two applications with the Commission seeking either the establishment of certain property (under lease to Fasken) within the Indian Basin-Morrow Gas Pool as a separate and distinct pool with special pool rules for production or, as an alternative, the exemption of Fasken’s wells from prorationing within the Indian Basin-Morrow Gas Pool and the establishment of special production…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Medler v. HenryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Continental Oil Co. v. Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Grace v. Oil Conservation Commission of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Board of Education v. State Board of EducationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Rutter & Wilbanks Corp. v. Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atlixco Coalition v. MaggioreNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Viking Petroleum, Inc. v. Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Amoco Production Co. v. HeimannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Bass Enterprises Production Co. v. Mosaic Potash Carlsbad Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Gila Resources Information Project v. New Mexico Water Quality Control CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.