Legal Opinion

Amoco Production Co. v. Heimann

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 24, 1990No. Nos. 88-2070, 88-2072, 88-2255 and 88-2355PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

Amoco Production Company (Amoco) appeals from a $4 million judgment arising out of its unitization of a carbon dioxide field in northeastern New Mexico. Amoco argues, inter alia, that the district court 1) misinstructed the jury on an oil or gas lessee’s duty of good faith, and 2) improperly failed to accord collateral estoppel effect to the findings of the New Mexico Oil Conservation Commission (OCC). Our jurisdiction over this diversity case arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We hold that 1) a good faith inquiry into an oil and gas lessee’s conduct is unnecessary where…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Federal Insurance Company v. Gates Learjet CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Finley v. Marathon Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Atiya v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. Atiya v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. K & D Farms, Ltd v. Enervest Operating, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Amoco Production Company v. HeimannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API