Legal Opinion

Jack McCarty v. R. N. Woodson, Director Kansas Penal Institutions

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 21, 1972No. 71-1066PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal follows dismissal of a civil rights action challenging the constitutionality of a Kansas amended regulation governing correspondence, legal materials, assistance and preparation of legal papers in penal institutions. Appellant McCarty alleged that the regulation denies equal protection and due process, among other things, and sought temporary and permanent injunctive relief, a declaratory judgment and the convening of a three-judge court. The trial court refused to give notice for the three-judge tribunal, determined that the action was frivolous, malicious…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Rinaldi v. YeagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anthony Souza v. Anthony P. TravisonoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  2. Hystad v. RhayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Roger Lee Woods v. Loren Daggett, Warden United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  4. Smith v. HalfordDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1983
  5. Henderson v. RickettsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API