Wm. R. Clarke Corp. v. Safeco Insurance of America
California Supreme Court
1DissentChin, J.
I dissent. The contractor and the subcontractors agreed that they would assume equally the risk the owner would not be able to pay for their work. The majority voids this agreement and forces the contractor to bear the risk not only that it will receive no payment for its own work but also that it will have to pay the subcontractors out of its own pocket. The majority accomplishes this end by (1) declaring the contractual provision at issue—the “pay if paid” clause—invalid as against public policy because it supposedly indirectly waives mechanic’s lien rights, even though the subcontractors…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.