Legal Opinion
Sibbald v. Johnson
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 1, 2003No. 02CV2186JM(JMA)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MILLER, District Judge.
Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff is not a federal employee within the meaning of Title VII. Plaintiff Carol Sibbald opposes the motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1) this matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
On November 5, 2002 Plaintiff commenced this action against the Secretary of the Navy (“Navy”) alleging that she…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Daniel Libraty v. Douglas A. Collins, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2025