Legal Opinion

John v. Bolinder

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 13, 2019No. CV-18-307Published

1Opinion of the CourtKenneth S. Hixson, Judge

This domestic-relations appeal arises from long-running and contentious litigation between appellant J. David John (David) and appellee Megan Marie Bolinder (Megan). The only issue in this appeal involves attorney's fees. In an order entered on December 14, 2017, the trial court ordered David to pay Megan $ 29,140 in attorney's fees. David argues that the attorney's-fee award should be reversed in its entirety because the trial court lacked the authority to award them, and also because Megan's motion for attorney's fees was untimely. We affirm as modified.

David and Megan were never married…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Hudson v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  4. John v. BolinderCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API