Legal Opinion

Federal Air Marshals v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 30, 2006No. 06-233PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

FUTEY, Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s Motion To Dismiss pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiffs, who are Federal Air Marshals (“FAM”), seek back pay and other relief because they allege defendant did not pay them overtime compensation for working more than forty hours per workweek pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1) (2000) (“FLSA”). Defendant claims that FLSA does not apply to FAMs because the Federal Aviation Administration Revitalization Act of 1995, 49 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Whalen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Grace M. Goodeagle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. Blue v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Federal Air Marshals(Fam) Fam 1 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API