Legal Opinion

LeMaster v. City of Winnemucca

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided October 8, 1986No. CV-R-85-483-ECRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDWARD C. REED, Jr., Chief Judge.

The defendants have moved to dismiss this case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12 due to plaintiff’s failure to comply with Fed.R. Civ.P. 4(j). Rule 4(j) reads:

Summons: Time Limit for Service. If a service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint and the party on whose behalf such service was required cannot show good cause why such service was not made within that period, the action shall be dismissed as to that defendant without prejudice upon the court’s own initiative with notice to such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shihshu Walter Wei v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Coleman v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  3. Islamic Republic of Iran v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Arroyo v. WheatDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1984
  5. Ruley v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. William Habib, Ruth Habib v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. David Floyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Motsinger v. FlyntDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
  4. Bryant v. Rohr Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1987
  5. Matasareanu v. WilliamsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API