Legal Opinion

Bruno v. Severini

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1921No. Civ. No. 2239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The action is to recover the sum of $985.75, alleged in the complaint to be due plaintiff for labor performed, for the hire of a team of horses and for a certain sum of money paid out by plaintiff for defendants for certain merchandise at the latter’s instance and request, and for services as a cook performed for defendants by plaintiff’s wife, the latter having for the purposes of collection assigned her claim for said services against defendants to plaintiff.

The complaint is in three counts, and pleads the several claims referred to as upon an express contract and also for the alleged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leitch v. MarxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  2. Puterbaugh v. McCrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Swing v. LingoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Ralph v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Ellwood v. NiedermeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API