Ito v. Investors Equity Life Holding Company.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
POLLACK, J.
I. Introduction
Of fundamental importance in this case is the distinction between ownership of an insurer, represented by title to company stock, and ownership of the insurer’s assets, i.e. the insurer’s estate. Stock that represents ownership of an insurer is "not part of the insurer’s estate. The two letters central to this case, from Appellant Investors Equity Life Holding Company’s (IELHC) to the Hawaii Insurance Commissioner, appointed by the circuit court as liquidator (Liquidator), present only an assertion of title in Investors Equity Life Insurance…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- A.H. Robins Co. v. PiccininCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- In Re G.S.F. CORPORATION, Debtor, Chase Commercial Corporation, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.