Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Deskins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 3, 1923No. 12854PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was commenced by defendant in error to compel the plaintiffs in error to assign an interest in a departmental oil and gas lease to defendant in error. The parties ■ will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants, as they appeared in the court below. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and defendants have appealed.

'The defendants procured a departmental oil and gas lease on the lands of Janie Arkansas, a full-blood Mississippi Choctaw Indian. Under the rules and regulations of the Department of the Interior relative to assignments of departmental leases, it is provided:

“No…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roquemore & Hall v. Mitchell Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Rice v. TheimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Ellis v. TreatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  4. Hardwood Interior Co. v. BullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Hurlbut v. KantzlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atlantic-Pacific Oil Co. v. Gas Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Pacific-Wyoming Oil Co. v. Carter Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Worley v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Pettit v. VogtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  5. Texas Co. v. HerringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API