Legal Opinion

City of Montpelier v. Senter

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 8, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Assumpsit. Plea, general issue. Trial by court on an agreed statement of facts. Washington County, March Term, 1899. Thompson, J., presiding. Judgment for the plaintiff, proforma and without hearing, for the sum of three hundred dollars. The defendant excepted. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRowell, J.

The defendant was elected mayor of the city at its annual meeting in March, 1898, for the term of one year. *113At that time the city charter prohibited compensation to the mayor and the aldermen for their official services. But by No. 184, Acts of 1898, which took effect November 30 of that year, the charter was amended, among other ways, by striking out the words prohibiting such compensation, and giving the mayor a salary of $300, and each of the aldermen a salary of $150. Shortly before the expiration of their terms of office, the mayor and each of the aldermen were paid the full amount of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. County of Douglas v. TimmeNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Sturgis v. HullSupreme Court of Vermont · 1875

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nix v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  2. In re DexterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  3. Carpenter v. Vermont Department of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  4. Burlington Fire Fighters' Ass'n v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. United States ex rel. Strait v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API