Legal Opinion

In Re Apportionment of Wayne County-2001

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 2002No. Docket 235339PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners filed this original action pursuant to MCL 45.505(5), seeking to set aside an apportionment plan adopted by the Wayne County Apportionment Commission (respondent) on June 8, 2001, 1 and further seeking an order compelling respondent on remand to adopt a plan known as the Price plan. The Price plan was submitted to respondent on June 8, 2001, by petitioner Shannon G. Price before adoption of the plan currently being challenged. Pursuant to MCR 7.206(D)(3) we grant peremptory relief, vacate the apportionment plan adopted by respondent, and remand for adoption of a new plan.

Wayne…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Abate v. MundtSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Board of Estimate of City of New York v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. In Re Apportionment of State Legislature—1982Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Apportionment of Wayne County Board of Commissioners—1982Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Apportionment of Tuscola County Board of CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re Apportionment of Wayne County-2001Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API