Fuqua v. Flowers
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
TOM Glaze, Justice.
This appeal arises from the trial court’s tice. complaint filed by Jannetta Fuqua and Beverly Hayes against Dan Flowers, Director of the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, Francis Jones, a district sign foreman for the Department, and the Department itself (collectively referred to as ASHTD or the Department). Our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2 (a)(1), as the appeal asks us to interpret the sovereign immunity provisions of the Arkansas Constitution. We find no error, and we affirm the trial court’s decision.
The facts underlying this case…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Deitsch v. TillerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Crockett v. EssexSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Angle v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Fireman's Insurance v. Arkansas State Claims CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Neal v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Barton Ex Rel. Estate of Barton v. TaberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Faulkner v. Arkansas Children's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Fegans v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Simons v. MarshallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- City of Fayetteville v. RomineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.