Legal Opinion

In Re $18,823.06 U.S. Currency And

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 2018No. C–160775PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

*351{¶ 1} Holly Galvez appeals from the judgment of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, which overruled her objections to the magistrate's decision and granted the state's petition for forfeiture of currency. The trial court ordered that $18,823.06 be forfeited under R.C. Chapter 2981. For the following reasons, the trial court's judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for an entry of forfeiture consistent with this opinion.

I. Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} On June 25, 2014, the Cincinnati Police Department, in conjunction with other police agencies,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited15 opinions

State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court · 2012
Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
United States v. Banco Cafetero Panama, Banco Cafetero Colon, Defendants-In-Rem-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
United States v. Pole No. 3172, Hopkinton, Etc., Appeal of Alice Gazda, Ida Ambrosio and Charles FogartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

In Re $18,823.06 U.S. Currency AndOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
State v. Adames Deli & Grocery, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019